 |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
The Other (Indian) Story:
Retrospecting Lakeeren –The Contemporary Art Gallery 1995-2009 exhibited at the
Modern Art Gallery, NCPA in March 2009 had a unique story to tell about Lakeeren
Gallery that opened in 1995 in Vile Parle as one the first galleries to exist
outside the South Mumbai, Kala Ghoda art circuit. The gallery’s uniqueness
stemmed from the fact that it challenged itself to present avant-garde art that
emerged at that moment in time to a new audience outside the usual South Mumbai
collector’s circle. The impact and influence of Lakeeren gallery and the
artists would be lost in the innards of time if not revisited or articulated as
a story that needed to be told. This is particularly relevant given the current
moment of globalization experienced by Indian art that can be traced back to the
liberalization of the Indian economy that began in the early 1990s, the time
when Lakeeren opened as a gallery. This moment of pre-globalization of Indian
art was a time when the explosion of new material and media was visible in the
works of younger artists, in which significant experimentation in photography,
video, web based and installation art came to be viewed.
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
| |
The artists sought to employ unorthodox mediums such as rice paper, egg cartons, found objects, making Lakeeren one of the first galleries to exhibit this new genre of art, kitsch ephemeral sculptural, performance art practices that were in the process of being defined. This newfound materiality also needed a new understanding towards art and art object itself, leading the gallery to adopt a mission statement to create a "social forum for the appreciation of art and art forms through knowledge based interaction by not only exhibiting art, but also providing a much needed intellectual platform." Thereby Lakeeren could be viewed not only as a gallery, but a much needed discussion platform that debated and articulated these new avant-garde practices in an Indian context. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Although Lakeeren Gallery
physically closed its doors in 2003, as I decided to peruse a PhD at Cornell
University in History of Art (poised with a degree in Creative Curating from
Goldsmiths College, London, 2001), the gallery opened an “intellectual” space
that would undertake to expand its art historical and curatorial enterprise
oeuvre to also include global art practices in its agenda. This expanded vision
of the gallery could be interpreted in extending Lakeeren’s “lines” as
connecting nodes, or in the words of philosophers Giles Deleuze and Felix
Guattari, to be considered within “rhizomatic” frame of reference to establish
new relationships outside predictable connections in a global art space. This
allowed the dismantling of relationships that are questionable and that no
longer work such as the genres of art and ghettoization of art as a national
project. I further extend this rhizomatic way of thinking to allow cross-overs
that intersect various aspects of my various practices as a gallerist, curator
and art historian creating a unique “third space” that allows me to engage and
push these areas to another level of interaction.top"> |
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
With a view to realize these
consideration it became critical for me to re-engage with the works, artists and
the context that I had undertaken over the period of eight years (1995- 2003).
Hence The Other (Indian) Story, was not only an endeavor to investigate the
artists work alone, but also an effort to retrospect my own practice at three
levels: as a gallery, second in the capacity of an intellectual inquiry, and
finally
as a curatorial endeavor that through the process of re-historicizing
engage with the present moment. |
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
| |
Finally The Other (Indian) Story could be viewed as a new curatorial endeavor that is Janus (double-faced) that on one hand articulates history by engaging the past while on in its flip side anticipates the future with the same vigor. This engagement with the past and present opens up a new space of questioning and self-critique in the present time with regards the artist and the gallery. Given the present moment of de-globalization and the economic downslide The Other (Indian) Story thereby can be considered as a refl ective moment for all to pause and review art and our individual practice in a renewed manner. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|